Site Visit – Historic Christ Church – Weems, Virginia

As much as I love museums and class assignments I didn’t drive two hours just for this assignment.  I was in the area to visit another museum for a work and the staff at Christ Church was kind enough to let us visit during their off season.    

The first Christ Church in Weems, Virginia, was a wooden structure built in the late 17th century by John Carter.  The brick, Anglican church – which stands today – was finished in 1735 using the private funds of Robert “King” Carter.  King Carter was the most powerful landowner and planter in colonial Virginia.  Today, Christ Church is one of the only 18th century structures in Virginia to retain most of its original fabric.  The structure boasts original flooring, plaster, wooden box pews, a triple-decker pulpit, brickwork and framing. 

 

Christ Church is owned and operated by the Foundation for Historic Christ Church, a 501c3 organization that was started in 1958 and has overseen the award-wining, onsite preservation work.  At Christ Church, visitors first see a small complex of administrative buildings and a small-yet-impressive museum which was renovated in 2009.  The museum contains exhibits on the church structure, the parish, the Carter family, the preservation efforts, and the Church of England.  The exhibits in the museum were designed by Riggs Ward, an award-winning design firm based out of Richmond, Virginia, that specializes in museum, visitor center and cultural institution work.   

 

Upon entering the museum, visitors see a small gift shop and information desk, staffed by volunteers.  Like most museum exhibits, visitors enter the space from the right.  There you can sit in  a replica of the high-backed wooden pews that are present in the church sanctuary to watch a short (10 minute) orientation video narrated by Roger Mudd.  The video contains the history of the Carter family in the area, the building of the church, its decline into abandonment and the preservation efforts brought on by the Foundation.  After the video, visitors enter a space dominated by classic museum exhibit work.  Original and reproduction paintings of King Carter and other family members, archeological remnants and other historic artifacts are displayed in cases and static exhibit space.  

 

A timeline of the Carter family, Christ Church, the Church of England, Virginia and its national history, Lancaster County and the restoration efforts winds throughout the entire museum space.  This eye-catching feature links events together and helps to set the church into the context of a bigger picture.   The exhibit space contains other traditional elements such as question doors that can be lifted to reveal answers.  There also are touchable elements that may be designed for children but also appeal to adults who would understand the concepts of construction.  For example, one can arrange plastic bricks into the Flemish bond pattern used to build the church.  Or, visitors can arrange similar plastic brick and stone pieces into the arches and keystones that adorn the windows of the church.  For those who are more mechanically inclined, wooden pieces (labeled with their correct structural definitions) are ready for persons to assemble into the complicated ceiling truss system that creates the vaulted ceilings inside the Church. 

 

Located in four different places within the small museum are touch screen monitors.  Each touch screen supports adjacent, traditional exhibit elements with in-depth material.  For example, one of the monitors covers the grounds around Christ Church and the grounds of the nearby home of King Carter, called Corotoman, which burned in 1725.  Users can navigate through information about the archeology conducted around both sites.  Or, a visitor may explore the natural and designed landscape of the church and home.  Other monitors go in depth regarding the Carter family, starting with John and King Carter and then moving forward through the generations of this large and long-standing Virginia family.  Another monitor covers the architecture of the church and the preservation work.  

 

The content of each touch screen video is a combination of primary source material, photographs, paintings and other historic illustrations, quotes, and open sources images and materials.  Designers made the navigation very easy.  Visitors can quickly skip from one screen to the next, allowing one to read only what interests them.  A home button also is prominently featured.  

 

The exhibits within the museum setting are very well done and appropriate for the scale of the historic site and the story the Foundation is trying to tell.  Once the visitor leaves the museum, the only interpretation of the grounds and church building are done by volunteer docents (tour guides).  Given the uniqueness of the building, it is refreshing to not be distracted by wayside signs or labels.  The building is allowed to speak for itself, and the docents expand and give life to its story.

 

Before or after one visits Historic Christ Church, much information can be gained from its Web presence.  The site, housed at www.christchurch1735.org, is well designed and contains an amazing amount of information for a small historic venue run by a non-profit.  Those doing research on the Carter family, colonial churches and 18th century architecture will find a great deal.  Navigation is well designed, with easy returns to the home page and an absence of frustrating loops or dead ends.  Home page tabs lead to topics including: history, architecture, preservation, archeology, events, volunteer, kids pages, among others.

 

The page dedicated to school field trips will be useful to teachers.  School-related programs are listed, with links to more in-depth information, to include covered SOLs.  Programs are further identified with appropriate grade levels and presentation time periods.  The only things missing are pre-visit lessons, worksheets and other materials.  Perhaps those are emailed at the time of reservation to avoid material poaching by others?  

 

All of the links are live with the exception of the link to Foundation newsletters.  The architecture page is fairly deep.  A click on the pulpit information page then links deeper to information on the clerk’s desk and the reading desk.  If you click on the clerk’s desk, you can link to the reading desk.  From either page it is easy to go back to main architecture page or home.  

 

For its strengths, there is room for improvement.  

  • The font for the navigation buttons on the left is small and hard to read.  Those buttons also could be bigger.  
  • The use of Lucida Calligraphy for the tagline of the organization across the top is cliché.  Christ Church is a historic site, so the website designer must have assumed they should use a font that more strongly suggests 18th century typography.  
  • There is a large amount of un-used space under the left navigation bar and the picture of the church.  Why not fill that space with something useful or engaging?  
  • There is no contact information for the website’s content manager.
  • While users are able to navigate back to the home page fairly easily, there is a lack of navigational consistency within the pages.  
  • From the archives page I would have expected to have found a link to images or research and documentation.  Instead you are taken to a question and answer “game.”  The questions are based on primary source material which is pictured on the page but not large enough for close study.  It’s an interesting concept, that is poorly executed and located.
  • Links to PDF’s do not contain labels identifying them as PDFs.  One such PDF link is their complete dendrochronology report.  A wonderful resource for historic preservation professionals, students and interested parties.  For the casual visitor there is no explanation of what this report is.  Not to mention its lengthly download time for slow connections.  
  • The site appears to be optimized for viewing on tablets.  There is however no mobile site for easier viewing on smart phones.   
  • There is no virtual tour of the church,  something that would be nice but also understandable for why it isn’t there.  Small museums live off the onsite visitors who pay an admission fee, leave a donation and spend money in a gift shop.  The photographs on the site are not done displayed using Flash technology – although I don’t think that detracts from the website.  There is no audio component either.  In the case of Christ Church I don’t know that its necessary or would enhance the visitor’s experience.  

 

The Christ Church museum exhibit is top notch for a smaller organization.  By many measures, it rivals much larger institutions.  The church itself is an impressive building and stands out on its own.  The website is impressive, given that many small, non-profit museums often have a very rudimentary or static digital presence.  The Foundation for Historic Christ Church has done a comprehensive and compelling job of presenting the history of the structure and its congregation, the Carter family and the area of Lancaster County.  

** I would recommend going during the warm weather months.  The church has no heat or AC.  There was a few inches of snow on the ground on the day of our visit and we were frozen by the time we left.  

 

3 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. abratcher1066
    Feb 13, 2014 @ 21:45:35

    I enjoyed reading your review of Christ Church. It looks like most of our class is too busy playing in the snow to post a site visit article, so I’m grateful you gave me something to think about besides shoveling. Here are my thoughts, based on your description of the site, in all of their ignorable glory:

    This museum sounds great for students of colonial architecture. I am having trouble, though, understanding why anyone else would want to go, and whether the average person would “get anything out it.”

    I say this not to criticize the museum. Rather, your description of Christ Church matches exactly what I’ve witnessed myself when I visit small, locally-organized museums. They don’t seem to me like educational establishments at all–rather, they strike me as little shrines and altars of local worship (no pun intended, with this being a church and all). If you have the time, I have a few questions.. and please forgive me if I miss something obvious, I only spent a little time on the website so I’m in a position of total ignorance.

    1. Why should anyone care about the Carter family? There are a great deal of other things people could be doing with their free time. Unless every visitor has an amazing knowledge of history (I think we can agree Americans don’t) why should they devote any mental energy to learning about this family? Maybe there’s something important about the Carters that I don’t know, or something that makes them easy to relate to, and thus interesting?

    2. Why do you think this museum exists? Is the church itself special? I see that it’s old, and that the website claims it was “among the most sophisticated in the colonies.” But unless you have a thing for old churches, I can’t see what makes this one noteworthy.

    3. You said that the “building is allowed to speak for itself.” What did you mean by that? (I am aware of the irony in this question!)

    4. The first thing I saw on the website was this quote:
    “Where in the house, built in these degenerate days of slight modern architecture, which may compare with Old Christ Church, either within or without?” -William Meade, 1857.

    What do you think of this quote being on the front page? Do you think that says something about the management’s social attitudes or political leanings?

    Again, I enjoyed your review, I wouldn’t have these questions otherwise. If you feel like answering all or any of them, or if you have something else to add, I’d be very interested to hear your thoughts!

    Reply

  2. flwrhistory
    Feb 16, 2014 @ 18:06:00

    Thanks for the questions. I’ll try to answer them.
    The Carter family: I don’t know that anyone outside VA would know the name. For that matter I doubt that there are many in VA who know the name – unless you are a history geek. But the Carter’s – especially King Carter were a very very wealthy family. King Carter was the Donald Trump of his time when it came to land development. He owned huge portions of Northern Virginia including large holdings in Prince William County. The family is also know in later generations for their attitudes toward slavery. I believe Robert Carter III freed his slaves in his will -but I could be remembering that wrong.
    Why visit: I agree if you have a thing for old churches then this would be on your list. Or if you are an architectural historian, conservator, historic masonry person then this is for you. I’m not any of those things and I thought it was a very cool building. The workmanship is incredible considering the time period it was built. Also the fact that so much of it survived unharmed for all these years is pretty remarkable. I also agree though that a lot of these little places are shrines or have that feeling. This one didn’t although I was there during the off season and our tour guide was the director of the site. I want to go back this summer and get a tour from a volunteer docent. That may put a whole different spin on the experience.

    Reply

  3. abratcher1066
    Feb 17, 2014 @ 04:54:46

    Thanks for you response! Thanks for clarifying the Carter bit–I admit colonial America is NOT my thing. You piqued my interest, and I might check it out myself this summer as well.

    Reply

Leave a comment